5. But this prediction is based on the assumption that the Russians did not suspect us of having designs hostile to her security, and that largely depends on whether she is satisfied with the measures taken to render·Germany (and Japan) innocuous. Should she not be so satisfied (and her demands are likely to be high and her methods perhaps very drastic to British and American eyes), she will always be in fear of an eventual combination with Germany against her, her attitude to this country will be suspicious and potentially antagonistic, she will be more preoccupied with her own security and will take her own measures to provide for it.
- Collection ID
- CAB81
- Conflict
- Second World War
- Countries
- Afghanistan Belgium Bulgaria China Czechoslovakia Denmark Finland France Germany Great Britain India Iraq Italy Japan Korea Lithuania Mongolia Netherlands Norway Ottoman Empire Pakistan Persia Poland Romania Russia Russian Empire Soviet Union Sweden Turkey United States of America
- Document Reference
- CAB 81/120/62
- Document Types
- Memorandum Report
- File Reference
- CAB 81/120
- Identifier
- 10.1080/swwf.cab81.0120.062
- Keywords
- Soviet Foreign Policy Post-war Planning Anglo-soviet Relations Casualties Soviet Society War Materials Resources Contingency Planning Ideology Reparations Soviet Satellite States
- Languages
- English
- Organizations
- Chiefs of Staff Foreign Office Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee Joint Intelligence Staff Post-Hostilities Planning
- Pages
- 18
- Persons Discussed
- Denis Capel-Dunn Josef Stalin
- Published in
- United Kingdom
- Themes
- International Relations
