Premium

20.500.12592/jj6q8j

Security in Persia. Report by J.I.C.

1 Oct 1943

attitude is, in fact, unjustified as there is nothing in the wording of the extract from CCS.109/1 in paragraph 5 above, which precludes delegation of duties to the Americans, which they alone can carry out. The Commander-in-Chief is enjoined to "ensure" security etc., i.e. he must retain ultimate responsibility, but this does not necessarily entail an inalienable undertaking to use British troops in every variety of this duty. A large part of our Security system for the railway must of necessity consist of detailed routine inspections of engines and rolling stock which can only be carried out by the organisation responsible for the operation and control of the railway, in other words, in this case by the American themselves.
india security iraq united states of america russia railways second world war iranian politics security service sabotage persia joint staff mission joint intelligence sub-committee chiefs of staff intelligence organization victor cavendish-bentinck francis inglis edmund rushbrooke geoffrey vickers francis davidson allied supplies to the ussr
Collection ID
CAB81
Conflict
Second World War
Countries
India Iraq Persia Russia United States of America
Document Reference
CAB 81/118/13
Document Types
Report Correspondence
File Reference
CAB 81/118
Identifier
10.1080/swwf.cab81.0118.013
Keywords
Security Iranian Politics Allied Supplies To The Ussr Sabotage Railways
Languages
English
Organizations
Chiefs of Staff Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee Joint Staff Mission Security Service
Pages
9
Persons Discussed
Victor Cavendish-Bentinck Francis Davidson Francis Inglis Edmund Rushbrooke Geoffrey Vickers
Published in
United Kingdom
Series
War Cabinet Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee Memoranda. October - November 1943. Papers Numbers. JIC 411-470. Volume XXVIII
Themes
Intelligence Organization

Related Topics

All