REAR ADMIRAL RUSHBROOKE said that the matter had been considered in the Admiralty, and that a proposed draft reply had been prepared for his consideration. He read out the terms of this draft reply and undertook to circulate copies to the Sub-Committee. GENERAL STRONG said that in his experience integrated Intelligence Staffs had not proved satisfactory in that each Commander-in-Chief had to have his own Intelligence Staff, who tended to deal with the same matters as the Integrated staff. The system, whereby each Commander-in-Chief had his own Intelligence Staff, and a Joint Intelligence Committee and Joint Intelligence staff were formed from representatives of the Commanders-in-Chief's Staffs, was a much more practical proposition.
- Collection ID
- CAB81
- Conflict
- Cold War
- Countries
- Australia China France Persia Russia Turkey United Kingdom
- Document Reference
- CAB 81/94/28
- Document Types
- Summary
- File Reference
- CAB 81/94
- Identifier
- 10.1080/swwf.cab81.0094.028
- Keywords
- British Intelligence Organisation Imperial Defence Training
- Languages
- English
- Organizations
- Chiefs of Staff Foreign Office Joint Intelligence Bureau Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee Joint Intelligence Staff Security Service South-East Asia Command
- Pages
- 4
- Persons Discussed
- Harold Caccia Thomas Haddon Stewart Menzies Edmund Rushbrooke Kenneth Strong Gerald Templer
- Published in
- United Kingdom
- Themes
- Intelligence Organization