TOP SECRET previously served with them in India, the Security Service could not accept the responsibility of challenging their suitability with the Indian or Pakistanian security authorities. Also it seemed unlikely that the Commonwealth Relations Office would agree to make representations to either of the Governments concerned. He pointed out that the nominees would already have been vetted by the Indian or Pakistanian security authorities to whom all personnel records had been given when we had left those countries.
- Collection ID
- CAB159
- Conflict
- Cold War
- Countries
- Australia India New Zealand Pakistan
- Document Reference
- CAB 159/6/41
- Document Types
- Summary
- File Reference
- CAB 159/6
- Identifier
- 10.1080/swwf.cab159.0006.041
- Keywords
- Former Colonies Intelligence Reports Intelligence Channels Intelligence Gathering Classified Documents Release Of Information Information Sharing Allies Alliances Security Secrecy Scientific Research Technology Intelligence Requirements Intelligence Services Responsibilities British Intelligence Organisation Scientific Experts Hong Kong Communism Chinese Civil War Chinese Foreign Policy Colonies Empire Invasion Threat Contingency Planning War Preparations Defence Predicting Enemy Intentions Assessing Enemy Strength Military Intelligence
- Languages
- English
- Organizations
- Chiefs of Staff Commonwealth Relations Office Foreign Office Joint Intelligence Bureau Ministry of Defence Security Service Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee
- Pages
- 6
- Persons Discussed
- John Gardiner William Hayter Stewart Menzies Douglas Packard Lawrence Pendred Percy Sillitoe Kenneth Strong
- Published in
- United Kingdom
- Themes
- Intelligence Organization Weapons Technology Nuclear Warfare Military Intelligence
