Comments by Joint Intelligence Committee, London, on Central Intelligence Agency Reports. S.R. 21 INDIA AND PAKISTAN Summary: end of 3rd paragraph. 1. We do not agree that the Communist Party has a "controlling position in the Indian Labour movement." Section II Economic situation page II 1 first two paras 2. There is a suggestion here that Indian economy has been retarded by being subjected to "development as a Colonial area." During the last 100 years, British rule in India has provided the impetus for the development, not only of the irrigation systems on which all India's agriculture is founded, but of great industries, of which jute and cottontextiles are good examples.
- Collection ID
- CAB158
- Conflict
- Cold War
- Countries
- Burma Ceylon China Czechoslovakia Egypt Formosa Great Britain India Japan Pakistan Palestine Philippines Russia United Kingdom United States of America USSR
- Document Reference
- CAB 158/4/18
- Document Types
- Report
- File Reference
- CAB 158/4
- Identifier
- 10.1080/swwf.cab158.0004.018
- Keywords
- Information Sharing Anglo-american Relations Intelligence Reports American Intelligence Services Foreign Policy Security Intelligence Channels Colonies Empire Occupied Japan Partition Predicting Enemy Intentions Contingency Planning Operations Planning Colonial Independence Movements Imperial Defence Transportation Industry Industrial Intelligence Economy Military Strength War Materials Alliances Allies
- Languages
- English
- Note
- This document was retained under Section 3(4) of the Public Records Act, 1958 in August 1995, but was released in October 2013.
- Organizations
- Central Intelligence Agency Chiefs of Staff Ministry of Defence United Nations Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee
- Pages
- 10
- Persons Discussed
- Valentine Boucher William Hayter Lawrence Pendred Kenneth Strong
- Published in
- United Kingdom
- Themes
- Intelligence Operations International Relations
